Print:
Back to Post

Choosing the right Christmas tree

Posted Mon, Dec 01, 2008
POST A COMMENT »

Just when you thought that life is not at all predictable, I come along with a morsel of information that shatters your illusion.

With Christmas little more than a couple of weeks away we are coming up to THE big weekend for Christmas tree sales. In fact, most Christmas tree sales will occur exactly 2 weekends prior to December 25th.

I know this based on more than a few years in the retail 'Christmas tree' business.

Which brings me to the most asked 'gardening' question this time of year, which is, 'What is the best Christmas tree?'

It is a great question because not all Christmas trees are created (grown) equal and there are new varieties/species offered almost every year. I will get to that in a moment, but first a short speech in defense of the 'plantation grown' Christmas tree.

There are sincere but misguided people out there who will tell you that buying a Christmas tree is bad for the environment. The thinking goes like this: why would you cut a perfectly good tree down in the forest when it could continue to serve a purpose left standing there? Wildlife benefits from trees as does the environment (all of our oxygen, after all, is produced by the green living world around us).

If we cut trees down in the forest for Christmas - trees that otherwise would stand for a long time naturally - I would agree with the above stated argument. But the truth is that no respectable retailers in Canada would sell cut Christmas trees that were cut from a natural stand of evergreen trees. Virtually all of the trees that are available for sale from nurseries, garden centres, retailers, Boy Scouts and church groups are 'plantation grown'.

The truth about the Christmas tree that you buy...

It takes between 8 and 10 years to grow a good quality Christmas tree.

They are generally grown on marginally productive land to begin with. While growing they provide valuable protection and a home for a wide variety of wildlife including birds, deer, rodents and butterflies. Christmas trees sequester carbon and exhale pure, clean oxygen (like all other trees). They reduce soil erosion and filter air born pollutants. They are not (generally) fertilized while in the field, and the use of pesticides seldom occurs and when it does, they are used judiciously (Christmas tree growers are not necessarily environmentalists, but the cost of pesticides alone discourages the practice of using them).     

Now that we have established the benefits of supporting the Christmas tree growers of Canada (they are a net-export crop by the way), let's look at the various qualities of the trees that are available:

Canadian Christmas trees: in order of my personal favourites:
Five ***** = very favourite.
One * = poor choice.

Fraser fir Christmas tree (Mark Cullen)

Fraser Fir *****. Tall, straight, wonderful evergreen scent and above average needle retention. A traditional look. Soft needles: easy on the hands. I will put one of these in my home partly because they are easy to set up. Have you ever put up a Christmas tree that had a crooked trunk? It is a test of anyone's good will and 'Christmas spirit'. If I am ever visited by the ghost of Christmas past, I am sure that he will take me to that day in the garage when I tried putting a Scots pine into a 3 legged tree stand. Not a pretty picture.
Cost for a 7 foot: between $45 and $65.

Noble fir *****. Much like the Fraser Fir but with a wonderful silver tone to the underside of the needles.
Cost for a 7 foot: $50 to $90

Balsam Christmas Tree (Mark Cullen)

Balsam ****. Great needle retention, straight trunk, nice scent. A maritime native. Only downside is the distance between branches is rather generous, giving the tree a thinner look than its' Fir cousins. You will get fewer ornaments on a Balsam, but if the tree has been aggressively pruned on the farm it can thicken up quite nicely. The lower cost may encourage you to look for this one at your local supplier.
Cost for a 7 foot: $35 to $50. 

Scots Pine ***. This was the #1 cut Christmas tree a generation ago. It was the tree that my Dad hauled home from the garden centre for our personal use for as many years as I can remember. The greatest advantage of the Scots Pine is that it has long needles that are stiff enough to hold up most any tree ornament. Also, it is densely branched, providing an excellent opportunity to load it up with lights and decorations. However, the trunk of the Scots Pine is seldom straight and never as straight as that of the Fraser Fir. It has reasonable needle retention, a gentle scent that is most intense when you first bring it into the house and the price is lower than any of the more popular trees.
Cost for a 7 foot: $30 to $45.

Scots Pine Christmas tree  (Mark Cullen)

White spruce **. The very first Christmas tree, which, legend has it, was cut somewhere in Bavaria, Germany about 350 years ago, likely was a spruce of some kind. This gives us the 'traditional' shape that most of us associate with the Christmas tree. That is about the limit of features that the White Spruce has to recommend it. 
It has poor needle retention, usually has wide gaps between branches (minimizing the opportunity for decorations and lights) and the scent is moderate.
Above all, I steer away from the White Spruce for the fire hazard that results from the dramatic needle drop. 
If you live in the country and are cutting a spruce down on your own property, be sure not to bring it indoors until about 5 days before Christmas. And take it back outdoors a couple of days after Christmas. That way the 'needle drop' will not cause too much of a problem: like clogging up your vacuum cleaner.
Cost for a 7 foot: Cheap, if you can find them.

A couple of tips when choosing and preparing your tree for indoors:

  • Look for a tree with a straight trunk - anyone that has tried to put a crooked tree in a stand will tell you the same thing.
  • Look for bushiness that suits your space. Look for a tree that is the right height for the room you plan to put it in. You pay for height when you buy a tree ? no use cutting off a foot or two!
  • Cut about 2 inches off of the bottom of the trunk the same day that you plan on putting the tree up. This opens up the capillaries in the tree, increasing its ability to take up water.
  • ALWAYS use a stand that holds water and make sure that you keep it topped up. This, more than anything else that you do will help the tree to hold its needles for the longest time possible.
  • When you dispose of your tree, leave it for the municipality to recycle OR place it in the garden, stand and all, until spring. In the mean time it will provide protection for visiting birds. I put mine within 20 ft of bird feeding stations.

Above all, take family and friends out for the tree selection experience and get the Christmas spirit stirred up well ahead of the big day!

Keep your knees dirty,


Mark Cullen

13 Comments

  • 1. Posted by on Tue, Dec 02, 2008

    re: "There are sincere but misguided people out there who will tell you that buying a Christmas tree is bad for the environment." I was one of them so thanks for this article (found my way here via your Dec. ed. of "Gardening with Mark". Merry Christmas all!

    Report Abuse
  • 2. Posted by Liz on Wed, Dec 10, 2008

    To extend the needle retention - go to the Christmas tree farm "plantation" and cut your tree fresh. This way you can see how it looks without being binded. Most trees are cut a few days prior to purchasing at a garden centre. Give the tree a good shake make sure there are not many needles falling off the tree, cut, pay for it at a much cheaper price then at the garden centre, and bring it home.

    Report Abuse
  • 3. Posted by Geoff S on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    Hi Mark. I'm not sure why you do not mention the Balsam fir which is very aromatic. Having grown up in Toronto they were always too expensive for my family so we had that aforementioned fav the Scots pine. Now living in Nova Scotia this has reversed.A Balsam is cheap and the Scots pine is considered the exotic thus expensive tree. Can't beat the smell of the Balsam.

    Report Abuse
  • 4. Posted by comonsence on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    You almost never see it but on the farm we used white cedar. Hard to get a good bushy one but they smell so nice and drop no leaves(needles) Kept in water stay very moist and aromatic. Not popular but different.

    Report Abuse
  • 5. Posted by mary_chakkalackal on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    It is good to have so much info on the net. I am just beginning to look @ them. Thank you for posting all these.

    Report Abuse
  • 6. Posted by Lucas on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    Yes, if you do buy a local tree there is little enviromental impact. But what about the masses of trees being transported overseas? Ikea has many beautiful fir's but coming all the way from Norway = huge carbon footprint!

    Report Abuse
  • 7. Posted by Cindy on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    What a great article! We always buy from the local Boy Scouts in NW Calgary, and not only are we supporting them, but we also receive a beautiful REAL tree as well. I always love that first deep smell of fresh evergreen as we're searching for the 'perfect' tree! I also read that for every tree which is cut 2 more are planted. Thank you for writing these comparisons!

    Report Abuse
  • 8. Posted by Native Granny on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    I just bought a beautiful 6.5 foot artificial tree. Wouldn't have it any other way. I simply can't justify killing a tree for a couple of weeks decoration in my home. A good can of pine spray and you would never know my tree was not real. Not to mention NO cleanup. Easy to assemble, each branch is colour coded so even the dumbest of dummies like me can put it together. Got it at Zellers at 50% off last weekend...... cost me $35. It will last a lifetime - and more!

    Report Abuse
  • 9. Posted by vtgandhi@rogers.com on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    JUST THINK SMART, ENJOY YOUR HOLIDAYS WITH ARTIFICIAL CHRISTMAS TREE. TO HAVE REAL TREE IS OLD TIME CONCEPT, WE CAN NOT IGNORE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE. THAT TREE TAKES YEARS TO GROW UP ,WE CUT THEM AND USE FOR 2 WKS. AND DESTROY THE GREEN ON THE EARTH. HELP PROTEST TO CUT THE TREE, BE EARTH FRIENDLY. WE ARE LIVING IN 21ST CENTURY AND NOT IN 17 TH. THINK SMART AND SAVE FOR OUR NEXT GENERATIONS.

    Report Abuse
  • 10. Posted by mudrow on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    Your points are valid, but it still seems a waste to kill a tree just to have it inside for a few weeks. We've opted to get a potted tree, which we bring in for Christmas and then put back outside again. When it grows too big for its pot, we plant it and get a new one. I also want to add to lucus_goris's post about carbon footprint. Absolutely true that Canadians buying a tree from Norway is ridiculous! But I also see East Coast trees being sold in Calgary---all that fuel to drive trees 2500km, when we could buy Alberta grown ones? So yes, if one buys a tree that was grown close by, from a local supplier, all's good. Otherwise, it's wasteful in many respects, despite this article's arguments

    Report Abuse
  • 11. Posted by Sparky Pants on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    If people didn't buy real Christmas trees, what would the areas the "plantations" are on be used for? They certainly wouldn't be growing a forest there. They would most likely have a different commercial centre on them. Even though the purpose of these "plantations" are to cut down trees to sell, many trees won't be cut down at all (if they are undesirable by the costumers). Even after a tree is cut down, a new one is planted! I don't think it's logical to believe such a practise isn't environmentally friendly. It is more wasteful than having a forest, but to be reasonable, there would be a forest there if the plantations ceased to exist. However, I do agree that if one is buying a real tree, or anything, you should try to do it locally. Buying Christmas trees from Norway is definitely illogical and wasteful.

    Report Abuse
  • 12. Posted by Fletch on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    The way I see it, with artificial trees and the fake pine scent, those toxins you eventually dispose of into the landfill/atmosphere are worse off than cutting down a plantation tree which rotates its crop.. Wouldn't you prefer to breathe in what a tree has to offer than what a can of spray has to offer?? Enjoy your toxins! :P

    Report Abuse
  • 13. Posted by coopejx on Sat, Dec 13, 2008

    Mark, You did not mention my favorite: Douglas Fir. I grew up in Vancouver and as kids our walk to school took us through a city block full of Douglas Fir trees. More recently I helped a friend with his commercial Christmas tree business in Toronto. We got trees from a plantation near Peterborough that was started (and then abandoned) by Americans. The stump on these trees gets to be huge, and it takes 5 strong guys to lift a 25-30 foot tree into place. My friend had special heavy stands with outriggers. The scent from the oil is all over your hands after lifting the trees. 3 trees together looked magnificent in the bank's main branch in downtown Toronto. Way too big for the average house. The plantation ran out of suitable trees after 5 years. The original tradition was to have a tree outside and use it year after year. Candles were attached to the branches to guide a person through the dark. It is such a waste to cut a tree down for a few weeks inside.

    Report Abuse

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT
character(s) remaining

You must sign in to leave a comment