Print:
Back to Post

Ghost students busted: Does spying belong in the classroom?

Posted Fri, May 29, 2009
POST A COMMENT »

Your college-aged daughter is required to do some of her course work online. A couple of times each week, she logs on to the course website to catch up on lecture notes and engage in chat sessions with her classmates and the two ghost students who are being paid by her professor to gather information about your daughter and her classmates. (Yes, ghost students.)

Educators are always looking for new ways to evaluate online learners, but does planting ghost students in the online classroom cross the line, ethically speaking?

That issue has become the subject of much debate this week, ever since The Chronicle of Higher Education reported that academics in Indiana, Connecticut, and South Africa have started to pose as students to gather information about their real students.

Critics of the practice point out that the process causes students to lose trust in their course instructors. "What other sneaky tricks do you still have to admit responsibility for?" one student asked after finding out about the ghost students.

Fans of the technique argue that ghost students can jump-start conversations, monitor student discussions, and make learning more interactive, thereby helping to reduce drop-out rates.
It puts into question the trusting and respectful relationship that has to be developed between teacher and student. And if you betray that trust, and you in effect set up an espionage system, then how on earth are you going to have meaningful, deep, authentic discussions?

In situations like this, I always ask myself how I'd feel in a similar situation, say if an employer hired ghost employees to keep tabs on me.

My verdict? Definitely not cool.

So what's your take on this online teaching method? Do you think its ethical for teachers to pretend to be students? How do you think your child would react if he or she found out after the fact that one of his or her classmates was actually a teacher?

5 Comments

  • 1. Posted by Carlsberg on Mon, Jun 01, 2009

    That IS disturbing, and pretty lousy. I can't understand why my instructor can't just ASK me how I'm enjoying my online courses. Better yet; how about paying actual TUTORS/TEACHER AIDES to actually speak to the students one on one instead of this closed door garbage. This whole 'undercover' deal reminds me of the saying 'one lie spoils a thousand truths'.

    Report Abuse
  • 2. Posted by tarzanswife2001 on Mon, Jun 01, 2009

    if you are in school ,no matter what format, why are you surprised there are teachers present.

    Report Abuse
  • 3. Posted by lilgerdie on Tue, Jun 02, 2009

    Teaching Assistants and Graduate Assistants are the bridge between the professor and student, I agree with Carlsberg's comment. In tutorials questions arise, interest in course material is voiced. It may be too late but at the end of the course there are Teacher Evaluations where students are asked a series of questions, and some evaluations ask questions regarding student interest in course material, how effective the professor was with material etc. Ghost Students used to direct online discussions are not a good idea. If the students in the course do not grasp concepts enough to come up with related discussions online, that is an indicator the course material and lessons are not coming across correctly. That would give the profs/teachers an opportunity to discuss the material/explain it in the classroom. As for work that would be annonying and creepy to discover you have fake co-workers whose sole job is to spy on you and report to your boss!

    Report Abuse
  • 4. Posted by Brian and Brenda Joyce on Tue, Jun 02, 2009

    Any form of deception is completely unfair and seriously wrong. This kind of interaction can just as well be done by our school's policy of "peer guides", other students who volunteer to assist younger students. They're not online, but could easily be as a board moderator or advisor.

    Report Abuse
  • 5. Posted by noeffects83 on Tue, Jun 02, 2009

    its actually quite simple. its a good thing for 2 reasons. some students are too shy to ask for help. the ghost student can find out a student needs help and can report to the prof and get them the help. and 2 whats wrong with more teachers? more people who can help is always a good thing. if you're on a boat that has 300 crew members and 700 passengers and for some reason the boat starts sinking, would you feel "betrayed" to find out that 50 of the 700 passengers were actually crew members and those crew members helped save you from drowning? there is NO debate on this matter. unless the spying goes further than the classroom; if they start stalking you and reporting when you eat dinner and watching you sleep etc. or even if they start collecting personal information then thats different. but if its nothing personal then why is it a bad thing? lilgerdie: you are correct and very incorrect. "If the students in the course do not grasp concepts enough to come up with related discussions online, that is an indicator the course material and lessons are not coming across correctly." that statement is correct. you are, however, incorrect because the ghost students will help the real students learn. who cares if a teacher is pretending to be a student? they're still a teacher regardless so i dont see why this issue matters. Carlsberg: do you know HOW many students are dishonest to teachers? this method gives raw feedback on how students are actually enjoying/learning in the class.

    Report Abuse

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT
character(s) remaining

You must sign in to leave a comment